I've listed a bunch of these at:
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/18/131441/16
but I think the most important question, at this point is:
Did Woodward become an active participant in the obstruction of the investigation?
Its rather difficult to credit Zephyr's claim that ""I certainly didn't expect it to be picked up by anyone" in light of this
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/webcred/index.php?p=17
The "no one will notice" excuse doesn't cut it if you make an effort to be noticed by this group. And its pretty obvious that is what happened....
· Blanche Lincoln's website supports public option (desmoinesdem)
· Big Coal's PR Spending Spree (desmoinesdem)
· IA-03: Former college wrestling coach to challenge Boswell (desmoinesdem)
· Tea Baggers Target Gore... (Cliff Schecter)
· Stimulus Watch (Jerome Armstrong)
· CREW seeks ethics inquiry of Bachmann (desmoinesdem)
· Did IRC help? (MN Campaign Report)
· 5 Worst cities for urban youth (desmoinesdem)
· "The Bishops' Huge Financial Stake in Stupak-Pitts" (desmoinesdem)
· Conservative group wants FEC to override state laws on robocalls (desmoinesdem)
· URGENT: Call these House Ds Saturday to oppose Stupak amendment (desmoinesdem)
· WI-08: Wingnut plans to run as "conservative independent" (desmoinesdem)
